[Trigger,PWGHF] Add new trigger for non-prompt antideuterons from beauty #14756
Conversation
MRazza879
requested review from
alibuild,
ariedel-cern,
fgrosa,
lietava,
mpuccio and
zhangbiao-phy
as code owners
github-actions
bot
changed the title
|
Don't open a PR as ready for review if it doesn't pass the required checks. |
Please consider the following formatting changes to AliceO2Group#14756
|
Hi @MRazza879 thanks I will have a look! In the meantime, can you and @njacazio please clarify which is the difference wrt this other PR #14747? Am I wrong or is it a duplication? |
|
Ciao @fgrosa apologies for the confusion, it was just to have a common basis. The other one is closed now. |
fgrosa
left a comment
fgrosa
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hi @MRazza879 I am approving and merging so that we can start testing, but please take a look at the comments I posted and implement them in a second PR. Thanks a lot!
| } | ||
|
|
||
| const bool isTOFDe = std::abs(track.tofNSigmaDe()) < cfgTOFNsigma; | ||
| const bool isTPCDe = std::abs(track.tpcNSigmaDe()) < cfgTPCNsigma; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider to add the possibility to apply a selection on ITS PID Nsigma as well, even just a lower limit as done in the HF Filter
O2Physics/EventFiltering/PWGHF/HFFilterHelpers.h
Line 1033 in f04e9d2
|
|
||
| #include "../filterTables.h" | ||
|
|
||
| #include "PWGLF/DataModel/LFParticleIdentification.h" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
If I am not mistaken this is not needed
| #include "PWGLF/DataModel/LFParticleIdentification.h" |
|
|
||
| #include "CCDB/BasicCCDBManager.h" | ||
| #include "CommonConstants/PhysicsConstants.h" | ||
| #include "DCAFitter/DCAFitterN.h" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is not needed (please check also the other includes)
| #include "DCAFitter/DCAFitterN.h" |
…uty (AliceO2Group#14756) Co-authored-by: Marta Razza <marta.razza@cern.ch> Co-authored-by: ALICE Action Bot <alibuild@cern.ch>
5 participants
Hi @fgrosa,
this PR is to add the filter we discussed on non-prompt antideuterons from beauty.
I considered the time ambiguities, please let me know if it's in line with what you suggested.
cc: @ercolessi